God Bless Our Nation has Individuals willing to give the ultimate sacrifice AND that citizens show respect for such.
http://blip.tv/file/2246058/
Wednesday 24 June 2009
Banking & 1st Amendment - A letter Sent to Our Elected Officials
Dear Virginia Elected Officials,
We appreciate your attention to matters that are important not only for the Virginia constituents but also pressing for our nation. That is why I write to you again today to present our view on two important issues.
First addressing economic issues our government seems to have jumped into the financial fire headfirst without a viable plan other than providing such a blaze with more fuel to burn. It seems that at least part of our problems stem from loans given to persons UNQUALIFIED for such from commercial banks due to laws enacted enforcing them to do so. Being we are now in the difficult situation of balancing the books we would like to know whether these laws have been revoked or otherwise subjugated to new laws rendering them impotent? It would seem to be common sense that when a patient is bleeding profusely we need to apply severe pressure to stop such PRIOR to administering a transfusion. Repeal these laws that allow such practices and let banks carry on with their market place transactions.
Second issue concerns legislation introduced by Rep. Linda Sanchez, D- Los Angeles. Her measure known as HR 1966, labeled the Megan Meier Cyber-bullying Prevention Act, actually extends far beyond cyber-bullying and would seemingly make it a federal offense to log onto the internet or use the telephone since such methods of communication where hostile speech would be banned include e-mail, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones and text messages. Clearly in modern times as communication methods have improved and notification and sharing of issues is instantaneous we MUST still live by our Constitutional freedoms granted to us. Let us ensure that we continue to abide by the 1st amendment and that this measure is not carried forth under any loophole to dodge what our founders intended related to freedom of speech.
With kind regards and trusting in your actions,
Jonathan E. Varnell
We appreciate your attention to matters that are important not only for the Virginia constituents but also pressing for our nation. That is why I write to you again today to present our view on two important issues.
First addressing economic issues our government seems to have jumped into the financial fire headfirst without a viable plan other than providing such a blaze with more fuel to burn. It seems that at least part of our problems stem from loans given to persons UNQUALIFIED for such from commercial banks due to laws enacted enforcing them to do so. Being we are now in the difficult situation of balancing the books we would like to know whether these laws have been revoked or otherwise subjugated to new laws rendering them impotent? It would seem to be common sense that when a patient is bleeding profusely we need to apply severe pressure to stop such PRIOR to administering a transfusion. Repeal these laws that allow such practices and let banks carry on with their market place transactions.
Second issue concerns legislation introduced by Rep. Linda Sanchez, D- Los Angeles. Her measure known as HR 1966, labeled the Megan Meier Cyber-bullying Prevention Act, actually extends far beyond cyber-bullying and would seemingly make it a federal offense to log onto the internet or use the telephone since such methods of communication where hostile speech would be banned include e-mail, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones and text messages. Clearly in modern times as communication methods have improved and notification and sharing of issues is instantaneous we MUST still live by our Constitutional freedoms granted to us. Let us ensure that we continue to abide by the 1st amendment and that this measure is not carried forth under any loophole to dodge what our founders intended related to freedom of speech.
With kind regards and trusting in your actions,
Jonathan E. Varnell
Thursday 11 June 2009
Mr. and Mr. or Mrs. and Mrs.????
Mr. and Mr. or Mrs. and Mrs.???? There is something odd with this statement. I place my shield now.....I am not a hate-monger AND there is something odd with this first statement. More and more (unfortunately) we see issues making news that we would rather not see as news or see in any other light. One issue is homosexual marriage. I still shudder even saying such. Some things are wrong. Wrong to the core, just plain wrong. We were taught from an early age in church or from our parents reading the bible to us on such and other moral points for life. The goodness of our nation is founded on being a moral and just society. The extremely forward thinking founding fathers knew that religion was the backbone of maintaining our morals. No matter how much the "in," thing today is to bash religion it was and is an integral part of who we are. I have lived where religion is very much out of the everyday lives of society and believe me the morals are nonexistent. I do not want to go off in a different direction from where I started this but I'd like to tie the moral & just way of life to the error in believing such things as homosexual marriage, partnership, civil union or any other term for it.
We are bombarded through media outlets that this is "progressive," thinking and that this is the next great advancement of society. No matter how it is disguised it is repugnant to even consider gay rights on the same level as the struggle for civil rights for blacks earlier in our history. A matter of fact I will argue they are complete OPPOSITES. Being against someone due to their race "racism," is morally wrong and anyone condoning it is wrong in the eyes of our creator, persons suffering such should fight against such oppression. Two persons of the same sex forming a union/relationship/partnership as in the frame we understand as husband and wife is morally wrong and anyone doing such or condoning such is wrong in the eyes of our creator, persons seeing society condoning such should stand up and fight against this.
We must ensure the voice of the moral right is heard and that we protect our society from further degeneracy. We should not and will not allow persons wanting to participate in driving morals out of our society through whatever guise they may use to do so. Religion is the bastion of our principles, morals and upstanding guidelines for life. We have to bring such influence into our government and not separate it and treat it as an unenlightened force. I see no issue in doing so and not violating the separation church and state as I believe separation of church and state was intended to protect us from the government forcing a national religion upon us not to keep us away from religion. And any religion that people may practice (that does not cause harm to another) should be allowed to be practiced and it's thoughts and influence utilized by politicians practicing such. How can we separate the moral upbringing of a christian politician from the way his thoughts are formed and in turn legislation enacted? We can not and should not even try to. Many of the founding fathers were practicing worshippers of various faiths and they were able to all agree on "Our Creator." Fight for the moral protection of our nation, our children and our future. As a first step stand up and denounce homosexual marriage.
We are bombarded through media outlets that this is "progressive," thinking and that this is the next great advancement of society. No matter how it is disguised it is repugnant to even consider gay rights on the same level as the struggle for civil rights for blacks earlier in our history. A matter of fact I will argue they are complete OPPOSITES. Being against someone due to their race "racism," is morally wrong and anyone condoning it is wrong in the eyes of our creator, persons suffering such should fight against such oppression. Two persons of the same sex forming a union/relationship/partnership as in the frame we understand as husband and wife is morally wrong and anyone doing such or condoning such is wrong in the eyes of our creator, persons seeing society condoning such should stand up and fight against this.
We must ensure the voice of the moral right is heard and that we protect our society from further degeneracy. We should not and will not allow persons wanting to participate in driving morals out of our society through whatever guise they may use to do so. Religion is the bastion of our principles, morals and upstanding guidelines for life. We have to bring such influence into our government and not separate it and treat it as an unenlightened force. I see no issue in doing so and not violating the separation church and state as I believe separation of church and state was intended to protect us from the government forcing a national religion upon us not to keep us away from religion. And any religion that people may practice (that does not cause harm to another) should be allowed to be practiced and it's thoughts and influence utilized by politicians practicing such. How can we separate the moral upbringing of a christian politician from the way his thoughts are formed and in turn legislation enacted? We can not and should not even try to. Many of the founding fathers were practicing worshippers of various faiths and they were able to all agree on "Our Creator." Fight for the moral protection of our nation, our children and our future. As a first step stand up and denounce homosexual marriage.
Monday 8 June 2009
A Definite Read....
Not one to promote items for sale though I would recommend if you are concerned about the state of our nation and want to read a common sense approach to saving it AND a detailed view on SOME core issues that confront us you need to read this book......
The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11
The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11
Saturday 6 June 2009
FDR D-Day Prayer
Spend 6 minutes and listen to a worthy speech from FDR given on D-Day June 6, 1944.
http://newt.org/FDRDDayPrayer/tabid/241/Default.aspx
I have to wonder being the base of the speech is a prayer to God for our nation and way of life what type reaction would we get from today's society for such. The ACLU and left-wing liberals would more than likely cry foul and demand it be rescinded or maybe he apologize. These persons have and do undermine the integrity of our nation, our founders wanted separation of church and state to ensure all persons have a right to practice what religion they may choose and even to do so using government buildings as long as there was equal access for all religions. These people have turned the principle upside down and in doing so have created a society where the moral base is degenerative. This fits in with the title of my page "Wake Up America," the left-wing is destroying us not protecting us.
http://newt.org/FDRDDayPrayer/tabid/241/Default.aspx
I have to wonder being the base of the speech is a prayer to God for our nation and way of life what type reaction would we get from today's society for such. The ACLU and left-wing liberals would more than likely cry foul and demand it be rescinded or maybe he apologize. These persons have and do undermine the integrity of our nation, our founders wanted separation of church and state to ensure all persons have a right to practice what religion they may choose and even to do so using government buildings as long as there was equal access for all religions. These people have turned the principle upside down and in doing so have created a society where the moral base is degenerative. This fits in with the title of my page "Wake Up America," the left-wing is destroying us not protecting us.
Friday 5 June 2009
Monday 1 June 2009
GM is truly Government Motors
Another sad day is upon us and I must say another first I thought we'd never see has arrived. Our government (representing us) is now the largest stakeholder in a previously private company that received taxpayer funds to bail-out the company "to get it back on track." Adding to the list of bail-outs we have a Bail-out turned Bankrupt. Too big to fail? I question such. Who will be deemed next as too big to fail? Will the government mandate we must buy x% of cars from this company? Take a step back people, we are an independent nation because our forefathers (guided by providence) decided to say here and now we take a stand. Where is our stand? Our country is turned topsy-turvy by our "representatives," and now we own a car company. As a bonified taxpayer will I get a discount on the purchase of a GM vehicle? Seems fair since I've already contributed to the company's well-being. NO I WILL NOT BUY A GM and it's not because I do not support American businesses. I support the principles America was founded on where limited government is the best government and when the government becomes larger and steps into this (financial institutions) and that (automotive companies) and the other (medical care/insurance) I say enough.....by the way did you see that new FORD? Go FORD!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Citizens Against Government Waste
www.cagw.org